Standards in this Framework
| Standard | Description |
|---|---|
| HS.CS.D.1 | Explain how abstractions hide the underlying implementation details of computing systems embedded in everyday objects. |
| HS.CS.HS.1 | Describe levels of abstraction and interactions between application software, system software, and hardware layers. |
| HS.CS.T.1 | Develop guidelines that convey systematic troubleshooting strategies that others can use to identify and fix errors. |
| HS.NI.C.1 | Describe how sensitive data can be affected by malware and other attacks. |
| HS.NI.C.2 | Recommend security measures to address various scenarios based on factors such as efficiency, feasibility, and ethical impacts. |
| HS.NI.C.3 | Compare various security measures, considering tradeoffs between the usability and security of a computing system. |
| HS.NI.NCO.1 | Evaluate the scalability and reliability of networks, by describing the relationship between routers, switches, servers, topology, and addressing. |
| HS.DA.CVT.1 | Create interactive data visualizations using software tools to help others better understand real-world phenomena. |
| HS.DA.S.1 | Translate between different bit representations of real-world phenomena, such as characters, numbers, and images. |
| HS.DA.S.2 | Evaluate the tradeoffs in how and where data is stored. |
| HS.DA.IM.1 | Analyze computational models to better understand real-world phenomena. |
| HS.AP.A.1 | Create prototypes that use algorithms for practical intent, personal expression, or to address a societal issue. |
| HS.AP.V.1 | Use lists to simplify solutions, generalizing computational problems instead of repeatedly using simple variables. |
| HS.AP.C.1 | Justify the selection of specific control structures and explain the benefits and drawbacks of choices made, when tradeoffs involve readability and program performance. |
| HS.AP.C.2 | Use events that initiate instructions to design and iteratively develop computational artifacts. |
| HS.AP.M.1 | Decompose problems into smaller components using constructs such as procedures, modules, and/or objects. |
| HS.AP.M.2 | Use procedures within a program, combinations of data and procedures, or independent but interrelated programs to design and iteratively develop computational artifacts. |
| HS.AP.PD.1 | Evaluate and refine computational artifacts to make them more usable and accessible. |
| HS.AP.PD.2 | Use team roles and collaborative tools to design and iteratively develop computational artifacts. |
| HS.AP.PD.3 | Document design decisions using text, graphics, presentations, and/or demonstrations in the development of complex programs. |
| HS.IC.C.1 | Evaluate the ways access to computing impacts personal, ethical, social, economic, and cultural practices. |
| HS.IC.C.2 | Test and refine computational artifacts to reduce bias and equity deficits. |
| HS.IC.C.3 | Demonstrate ways a given algorithm applies to problems across disciplines. |
| HS.IC.SI.1 | Analyze the impact of collaborative tools and methods that increase social connectivity. |
| HS.IC.SLE.1 | Explain the beneficial and harmful effects that intellectual property laws can have on innovation. |
| HS.IC.SLE.2 | Explain the privacy concerns related to the collection and generation of data through automated processes that may not be evident to users. |
| HS.IC.SLE.3 | Evaluate the social and economic implications of privacy in the context of safety, law, or ethics. |
