Please enable JavaScript to use CodeHS

OH 8: CS.D.8.a

  1. Frameworks
  2. Ohio 8

CodeHS Lessons

Evaluate the advantages and limitations of existing computing devices to recommend design improvements based on analysis of how users interact with the device.

Computing Ideas (Lovelace)
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Creative Computing (MS)
Standard
10.3 Software
10.5 Future of Computing

Creative Computing (HS)
Standard
10.3 Software
10.5 Future of Computing

World of Computing
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Connecticut Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Delaware Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Florida Computing Ideas
Standard
4.3 Software
4.5 Future of Computing

Georgia Introduction to Digital Technology
Standard
4.3 Software
4.5 Future of Computing

Hawaii EXS0100 Intro to Computer Science A
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Iowa Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Michigan Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Montana Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

New Hampshire Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

New Mexico Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Pennsylvania Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

South Carolina Fundamentals of Computing
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing

Texas Computer Science 1
Standard
1.2 Software

Washington Tech Apps and Coding
Standard
2.3 Software
2.5 Future of Computing